Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Use of participatory epidemiology to compare the clinical veterinary knowledge of pastoralists and veterinarians in East Africa.
- Journal:
- Tropical animal health and production
- Year:
- 2006
- Authors:
- Catley, A
- Affiliation:
- International Institute for Environment and Development · United Kingdom
Plain-English summary
In areas of East Africa where resources are limited, it's important to use the knowledge of local livestock keepers to help identify and understand cattle diseases. This study looked at how pastoralists (people who raise livestock) and veterinarians (animal doctors) describe cattle diseases, focusing on their names and symptoms. By comparing the information from both groups, researchers found that they often agreed on the names and signs of diseases. They developed a simple scoring method that can be easily used in places with few resources, which could help improve disease tracking by incorporating local knowledge. Overall, this method shows promise for enhancing disease surveillance efforts in these regions.
Abstract
Because of severe resource and logistical constraints in large areas of Africa, disease surveillance systems need to maximize the use of information provided by livestock keepers and make correct interpretations of indigenous livestock knowledge. This paper describes the use of participatory epidemiology (PE) to compare the names, clinical signs and epidemiological features of cattle diseases as perceived by pastoralists and veterinarians. Using results from two previous studies with pastoralists in southern Sudan and Kenya, provisional translations of local disease names into modem veterinary terminology were used to develop a matrix scoring method for use with veterinarians. Matrix scoring data from pastoralists and veterinarians were then compared using simple visual comparison of summarized matrices, hierarchical cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling. The results showed good agreement between pastoralists' and veterinarians' disease names and diagnostic criteria. The matrix scoring method was easy to use and appropriate for use in under-resourced areas with minimal professional support or laboratory services. Matrix scoring could be used to assist livestock disease surveillance workers to design surveillance systems that make better use of pastoralist's indigenous knowledge and correctly interpret local disease names. The method should be combined with conventional veterinary investigation methods where feasible.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16986765/