Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Treatment of non-effusive feline infectious peritonitis using oral remdesivir or GS-441524: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
- Journal:
- Journal of feline medicine and surgery
- Year:
- 2026
- Authors:
- Brostoff, Terza et al.
- Affiliation:
- Department of Pathology · United States
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a serious and often fatal illness caused by a virus in cats. In a recent study, researchers compared two oral medications, remdesivir and GS-441524, to see which one works better as a first treatment for cats with non-effusive FIP. They treated 20 cats over 12 weeks and found that 90% of the cats on remdesivir and 70% of those on GS-441524 were alive and doing well after 16 weeks. While both medications were effective, remdesivir showed similar results to GS-441524, making it a good option for treating this disease. However, some cats did show signs of possible relapse later on, so ongoing monitoring is important.
Abstract
ObjectivesFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a fatal disease caused by feline coronavirus. The nucleoside analog GS-441524, the parent nucleoside of remdesivir, is the most commonly used FIP antiviral. Remdesivir is Food and Drug Administration approved to treat COVID-19 in humans and has been used primarily as an adjunctive treatment for FIP. Data on its efficacy as a first-line oral therapy, as well as its use to treat non-effusive FIP, remain limited. Therefore, this study compares the effectiveness of oral remdesivir vs GS-441524 as a first-line antiviral therapy for cats with non-effusive FIP in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Furthermore, this study aims to bolster the literature supporting remdesivir use in these cats, anticipating potential future fluctuations in drug cost, availability and legal access.MethodsCats with non-effusive FIP were randomly assigned to receive either oral remdesivir (38-42 mg/kg, n = 10) or oral GS-441524 (18-22 mg/kg, n = 10) q24h for 84 days (12 weeks). Follow-up was conducted at 6 and 16 weeks, and response to therapy, survival and disease-free remission were assessed. Long-term follow-up was also obtained by contacting owners 1.5-2 years after conclusion of the study.ResultsAt week 16, 9/10 (90%) cats treated with remdesivir and 7/10 (70%) cats treated with GS-441524 were alive and in clinical remission. Remdesivir met the statistical criteria for non-inferiority, with a difference in disease-free survival of 20% (90% confidence interval -8.5 to +48.5). All deaths during treatment occurred within the first 11 days of the trial. Long-term follow-up revealed new onset of clinical signs and raised concerns for potential late relapse of disease in four cats (two in each group).Conclusions and relevanceThis study supports the hypothesis that oral remdesivir is non-inferior to GS-441524 for achieving survival and disease-free remission from FIP at 16 weeks. Given evolving global drug access and costs, remdesivir is a viable first-line option.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41781382/