The intravenous administration of blood cell secretome can improve clinical signs in dogs with osteoarthritis.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the intravenous (IV) administration of blood cell secretome (BCS) compared to its intra-articular (IA) administration. In this cross-over study, ten dogs with bilateral hip osteoarthritis were initially assigned to an IA group (IAG). After a 180-day follow-up, the same 10 animals were assigned to an IV group (IVG). IAG received a single IA administration of 3&#xa0;ml of BCS per hip joint, and IVG received a single 6&#xa0;ml IV administration of BCS. Following each treatment, follow-up was conducted on days 0, 8, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180. In each follow-up, copies of the Canine Brief Pain Inventory (divided into pain interference score - PIS and Pain Severity Score - PSS), Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD), and Canine Orthopedic Index (COI, divided into function, gait, stiffness, and quality of life) were obtained. Results were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test, and Kaplan-Meier estimators were calculated and compared, p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05. The animals had a mean age of 7.6&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;2.9&#xa0;years and bodyweight of 27.8&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;3.6&#xa0;kg. Seven hips were classified as moderate osteoarthritis, and three as severe. No differences were found between groups from days 0 to +60d, with both groups showing clinically significant improvements. Improvements in the IAG lasted up to +120d. Kaplan-Meier estimators showed that dogs in IAG took longer to record the considered events. IVG also showed positive clinically significant results with different instruments. IV administration of BCS can improve the overall condition of dogs with hip OA, but the IA administration produces longer-lasting results.