Spatial Heterogeneity and Methodological Insights in Fish Community Assessment: A Case Study in Hulun Lake.

Abstract

Hulun Lake, a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve, faces mounting threats from extreme climate events and anthropogenic pressures, highlighting the need for robust biodiversity monitoring. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a promising tool for aquatic biomonitoring, yet different bioinformatic pipelines-such as Amplicon Sequence Variant (ASV) and Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) clustering-may yield divergent results. This study compares ASV and OTU clustering approaches in eDNA metabarcoding alongside traditional capture-based surveys to assess fish diversity in Hulun Lake. Across all methods, we identified 43 taxa (40 species), including the critically endangered <i>Acheilognathus hypselonotus</i> and vulnerable Choi's spiny loach (<i>Cobitis choii</i>). While eDNA methods detected 2~3 times more species than in nets (13 species), strong methodological correlations (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed between net frequencies and eDNA-derived relative abundances (based on both ASV and OTU datasets using 4th-root and log transformations). Clustering analysis of capture-based data revealed four distinct ecological zones: the areas near tourist facilities, Wuerxun River inflow region, Wulan Nuoer Lake (connected via the Wuerxun River), and the Lake Centre. Significant spatial variation (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between these four zones was found in eDNA datasets, whereas nets captured more heterogeneous patterns, consistent with previous studies. Community structures were shaped by both generalists (e.g., <i>Cyprinus carpio</i>, <i>Hemiculter bleekeri</i>) and habitat specialists such as Amur catfish (<i>Silurus asotus</i>). The Lake Centre hosted a unique assemblage, likely due to reduced human disturbance. Overall, both eDNA clustering methods outperformed capture-based survey in detecting species richness and offered semi-quantitative insights. However, discrepancies between ASV and OTU approaches were evident in resolving fine-scale community differences. We recommend an integrated monitoring strategy that combines the sensitivity of eDNA with the abundance resolution of net captured to inform spatially targeted conservation and habitat protection in this vulnerable ecosystem.