Rationale and Approach to Evaluating Interventions for Newborn Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Abstract

<h4>Introduction</h4>The neonatal period is the most vulnerable time in a child's life, contributing to almost half of all deaths in children under 5 years. Many of these deaths are preventable and are mainly caused by preterm birth, birth asphyxia, or serious infections. Over the past decade, the evidence base for interventions to prevent and manage these causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has expanded significantly. This growth calls for a comprehensive and systematic approach to synthesizing the available evidence. This paper describes the methodological approach taken before and during the conduct of the systematic overviews and reviews described in the online supplementary material (for all online suppl. material, see <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1159/000542754" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://doi.org/10.1159/000542754</ext-link>).<h4>Methods</h4>Alongside consultation with a newborn technical advisory group, the overall evidence synthesis approach began with an extensive literature-scoping exercise to establish a universe of interventions that were relevant to neonatal health and survival and to identify the associated systematic reviews examining their effectiveness. Three main approaches were taken to synthesize the evidence based on the availability of prior evidence. New systematic reviews were conducted for topics lacking an existing comprehensive synthesis. Existing systematic reviews with search dates prior to 2020 were updated. High-quality, up-to-date systematic reviews were used without modification. In all cases, trial data from studies conducted in LMICs were sought and prioritized for analysis.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A comprehensive approach to summarizing the best available evidence for newborn intervention effectiveness is described.<h4>Introduction</h4>The neonatal period is the most vulnerable time in a child's life, contributing to almost half of all deaths in children under 5 years. Many of these deaths are preventable and are mainly caused by preterm birth, birth asphyxia, or serious infections. Over the past decade, the evidence base for interventions to prevent and manage these causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has expanded significantly. This growth calls for a comprehensive and systematic approach to synthesizing the available evidence. This paper describes the methodological approach taken before and during the conduct of the systematic overviews and reviews described in the online supplementary material (for all online suppl. material, see <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1159/000542754" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://doi.org/10.1159/000542754</ext-link>).<h4>Methods</h4>Alongside consultation with a newborn technical advisory group, the overall evidence synthesis approach began with an extensive literature-scoping exercise to establish a universe of interventions that were relevant to neonatal health and survival and to identify the associated systematic reviews examining their effectiveness. Three main approaches were taken to synthesize the evidence based on the availability of prior evidence. New systematic reviews were conducted for topics lacking an existing comprehensive synthesis. Existing systematic reviews with search dates prior to 2020 were updated. High-quality, up-to-date systematic reviews were used without modification. In all cases, trial data from studies conducted in LMICs were sought and prioritized for analysis.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A comprehensive approach to summarizing the best available evidence for newborn intervention effectiveness is described.