Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Qualitative assessment of the commodity risk for spread of foot-and-mouth disease associated with international trade in deboned beef.
- Journal:
- Transboundary and emerging diseases
- Year:
- 2010
- Authors:
- Paton, D J et al.
- Affiliation:
- Institute for Animal Health · United Kingdom
Plain-English summary
This research looks at the risks of spreading foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) through international trade in deboned beef, which is beef that has had the bones removed. The presence of FMD in certain countries makes it difficult to trade livestock and their products, affecting food supply and investment in those areas. While there are procedures in place at slaughterhouses that can help reduce the risk of contamination, the study found that these measures alone may not be enough to guarantee that the beef is completely safe from the virus. More specific guidelines are needed to ensure that beef exported from regions with FMD is handled properly to minimize risks and facilitate trade. Overall, the findings suggest that while some safety measures are effective, there is still uncertainty about how to completely eliminate the risk of FMD transmission through deboned beef.
Abstract
The risk of importing foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) restricts trade in livestock and their products from parts of the world where the virus is present. This reduces trade opportunities and investment in the livestock sector of many developing countries and constrains global food supply. This review focuses on the risks associated with trade in deboned beef (DB) from foot-and-mouth disease (FMD)-infected cattle, countries or zones. A definition of DB is provided along with a description of the procedures for its preparation within beef slaughtering operations. Evidence is reviewed for circumstances under which DB can be contaminated with FMDV, and a commodity risk factor approach is used to consider the mitigating efficacy of slaughterhouse procedures. A combination of pre-slaughter and slaughterhouse measures has enabled DB to be safely imported into FMD-free countries from countries that were not nationally or zonally FMD-free. Nevertheless, current evidence does not provide absolute assurance that abattoir procedures for producing DB can result, by themselves, in a commodity with a negligible risk of transmitting FMDV without complementary measures to reduce the likelihood of slaughtering infected cattle. The main areas of uncertainty are the amounts of residual FMDV-harbouring tissues within DB, and our understanding of what constitutes a safe level of contamination. More detailed guidance should be developed to specify the mitigating measures needed in support of the export of DB from regions that are not officially FMD-free. This will help to avoid differences in interpretation of what is needed that give rise to obstacles to trade.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20569417/