PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Parenteral nutrition for horses with gastrointestinal disease: a retrospective study of 79 cases.

Journal:
Equine veterinary journal
Year:
2002
Authors:
Lopes, M A F & White, N A
Affiliation:
Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine · United States
Species:
horse

Plain-English summary

This study looked at the use of parenteral nutrition (PN), which is a way to provide nutrients directly into the bloodstream, for horses suffering from serious gastrointestinal diseases. Researchers reviewed the medical records of 79 horses treated between 1992 and 2000 and found that nearly half of them did not survive, mainly due to the severity of their illnesses. The study noted that horses that survived tended to have better initial nutrition levels and received PN for a longer time, while those that did not survive had more complications, like high blood sugar. However, because the horses had different diseases and symptoms, it was hard to determine how effective PN was overall. The authors suggest that more research is needed to better understand when PN might be helpful for horses with similar health issues.

Abstract

Parenteral nutrition is advocated for sick foals and horses, although there is no report which has critically evaluated its benefits in this species. Therefore, the hypothesis that parenteral nutrition (PN) is beneficial for horses with severe gastrointestinal disease was investigated in a retrospective study. Records from 79 treatment courses in horses with gastrointestinal disease were reviewed for the years 1992-2000. The fatality rate (48.1%) was attributed to the severity of the primary disease. Complications due to PN were recorded and hyperglycaemia was the most common complication associated with PN. The number of laparatomies, proportion of horses that received lipid emulsion and the daily cost were higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors. The length of PN course was longer in survivors, although glucose peak was observed later in nonsurvivors after initiation of PN. The content of vitamins in PN solution and plasma protein at the beginning of PN were higher for survivors, while the volume of plasma administered was significantly larger in nonsurvivors. In horses with inflammatory diseases, the rate of glucose infusion and the amount of vitamins administered were higher than in horses with nonstrangulated obstruction. The proportion of horses that received lipid emulsion was higher among those with nonstrangulated and strangulated obstruction than in the group with inflammatory conditions. Because of the diverse group of diseases and the variability in the clinical signs, evaluating the effect of PN on disease outcome was not possible. A prospective study to compare horses with similar clinical conditions treated and not treated with PN is needed to evaluate fully the benefits of PN, and to establish guidelines for patient selection for PN.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12108742/