Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Nonhypoalbuminemic Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Dogs as Disease Model.
- Journal:
- Inflammatory bowel diseases
- Year:
- 2021
- Authors:
- Hernandez, Juan et al.
- Affiliation:
- Oniris (Nantes-Atlantic National College of Veterinary Medicine · France
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
This study looked at 22 dogs with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which is a condition that causes inflammation in the intestines, and compared them to 14 healthy dogs. The researchers took tissue samples from different parts of the dogs' intestines and examined them for signs of inflammation. They found that while the dogs with IBD had varying levels of illness, their intestines didn't show major differences from the healthy dogs, except in the colon. The dogs with IBD had higher levels of certain antibodies in their blood, suggesting an abnormal immune response, but the study noted that more research is needed to fully understand these findings and confirm that dogs can be a good model for studying this disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing worldwide, emphasizing the need of relevant models, as dogs spontaneously affected by IBD may be, for better knowledge of the disease's physiopathology. METHODS: We studied 22 client-owned dogs suffering from IBD without protein loss and 14 control dogs. Biopsies were obtained from the duodenum, ileum, and colon. Inflammatory grade was assessed by histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and chemokine analysis. The expression of Toll-like receptors (TLR) in mucosa was immunohistochemically evaluated. Antibody levels against bacterial ligands (lipopolysaccharide [LPS] and flagellin) were measured in sera using enzyme-linked immunoassay. RESULTS: Dogs with IBD showed low to severe clinical disease. Histopathologically, the gut of dogs with IBD did not exhibit significant alterations compared with controls except in the colon. The number of CD3+ T lymphocytes was decreased in the ileum and colon of dogs with IBD compared with controls, whereas the numbers of Foxp3+, CD20+, and CD204+ cells were similar in the 2 groups. Three chemokines, but no cytokines, were detected at the protein level in the mucosa, and the disease poorly affected their tissue concentrations. Dogs with IBD exhibited higher serum reactivity against LPS and flagellin than controls but similar immunoreactivity against the receptors TLR4 and TLR5. In addition, TLR2 and TLR9 showed similar expression patterns in both groups of dogs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data described dysregulated immune responses in dogs affected by IBD without protein loss. Despite fairly homogeneous dog cohorts, we were still faced with interindividual variability, and new studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate the dog as a model.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33783501/