Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Myocardial protection by continuous, blood, antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia in rabbits.
- Journal:
- Acta cirurgica brasileira
- Year:
- 2007
- Authors:
- Martins, Antônio Sérgio et al.
- Affiliation:
- Botucatu Faculty of Medicine · Brazil
- Species:
- rabbit
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the effectiveness of the continuous, blood, antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia in an experimental model of isolated heart, evaluating ventricular function. METHODS: Rabbits were divided into four groups: Control--C(n=10); ischemic crystalloid cardioplegia--IC(n=10); ischemic blood cardioplegia--IB(n=10); ischemic non cardioplegia--INC(n=10). After the ischemic protocol period the ventricular function was analyzed by the intra-ventricular balloon technique. RESULTS: the intra-ventricular developed pressure (IVDP) was: C(92.90 +/- 6.86mmHg); IC(77.78 +/- 6.15mmHg); IB(93.64 +/- 5.09mmHg); INC(39.46 +/- 8.91mmHg) p< 0.005. The first derivative of intra-ventricular pressure in its positive deflection was: C(1137.50 +/- 92.23mmHg/sec); IC(1130.62 +/- 43.78mmHg/sec); IB(1187.58 +/- 88.38mmHg/sec); INC(620.02 +/- 43.80mmHg/se) p<0.005. The first derivate pressure in its negative deflection was: C(770.00 +/- 73.41mmHg/sec); IC(610.03 +/- 47.43mmg/sec); IB(762.53 +/- 46.02mmHg/sec); INC(412.35 +/- 84.36mmHg/sec) p< 0,005. The stress-strain angular logarithmic coefficient was: C(0.108 +/- 0.02); IC(0.159 +/- 0.038); IB(0.114 +/- 0.016); INC(0.175 +/- 0.038) p< 0.05. CONCLUSION: The ischemic group protected by blood cardioplegia showed better ventricular function than ischemic group protected by crystalloid cardioplegia and the non protected group.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17293949/