PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Incidence and characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from nasal colonisation in participants attending a cattle veterinary conference in the UK.

Journal:
PloS one
Year:
2013
Authors:
Paterson, Gavin K et al.
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine · United Kingdom

Plain-English summary

Researchers looked into how common it is for cattle veterinarians in the UK to carry a type of bacteria called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in their noses. They found that out of 307 veterinarians at a conference, 8 (or about 2.6%) tested positive for MRSA. All of these bacteria had a specific gene called mecA, which is known to make them resistant to certain antibiotics, but none had the mecC gene, which is linked to a higher risk from dairy cattle. The study showed that veterinarians who had recently visited a farm were more likely to carry MRSA compared to those who hadn't, but overall, the rate of MRSA colonization in these veterinarians was lower than in other veterinary settings and among healthcare workers. This suggests that while there is some risk of carrying MRSA from contact with livestock, it is relatively low among these veterinarians.

Abstract

We sought to determine the prevalence of nasal colonisation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among cattle veterinarians in the UK. There was particular interest in examining the frequency of colonisation with MRSA harbouring mecC, as strains with this mecA homologue were originally identified in bovine milk and may represent a zoonotic risk to those in contact with dairy livestock. Three hundred and seven delegates at the British Cattle Veterinarian Association (BCVA) Congress 2011 in Southport, UK were screening for nasal colonisation with MRSA. Isolates were characterised by whole genome sequencing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eight out of three hundred and seven delegates (2.6%) were positive for nasal colonisation with MRSA. All strains were positive for mecA and none possessed mecC. The time since a delegate's last visit to a farm was significantly shorter in the MRSA-positive group than in MRSA-negative counterparts. BCVA delegates have an increased risk of MRSA colonisation compared to the general population but their frequency of colonisation is lower than that reported from other types of veterinarian conference, and from that seen in human healthcare workers. The results indicate that recent visitation to a farm is a risk factor for MRSA colonisation and that mecC-MRSA are rare among BCVA delegates (<1% based on sample size). Contact with livestock, including dairy cattle, may still be a risk factor for human colonisation with mecC-MRSA but occurs at a rate below the lower limit of detection available in this study.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23869220/