PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

In vitro efficacy of a topical antimicrobial mousse and shampoo at proximal and distal hair locations against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi.

Journal:
Veterinary dermatology
Year:
2024
Authors:
Taketa, Tia T et al.
Affiliation:
Animal Dermatology Clinic · United States
Species:
dog

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topical therapy is essential in assisting with the resolution of pyoderma. OBJECTIVES: (i) Evaluate the in vitro efficacy and residual activity of two different hair segments treated with shampoo and mousse against meticillin-sensitive and meticillin-resistant staphylococci; (ii) compare proximal and distal hair portions treated with the products and (iii) describe a new disc diffusion method for assessing residual efficacy. ANIMALS: Eleven privately owned, medium-haired dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomised, blinded and negatively controlled study, dogs were treated once with a 3% chlorhexidine digluconate-0.5% ophytrium shampoo on the lateral thorax, and the corresponding mousse on the opposite side. Hairs were plucked before treatment, two&#x2009;hours post-treatment, and day (D)2, D4, D7, D10 and D14. Hairs were weighed (0.01&#x2009;g) and cut (1.0&#x2009;cm) from the proximal portion, moistened with saline and placed on a sterile diffusion disc to absorb the solution. Proximal and distal hair bundles and diffusion discs were placed onto agar inoculated with an isolate of meticillin-sensitive or meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius or Staphylococcus schleiferi. Inhibition zones were measured following incubation. RESULTS: Distal hairs had larger (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) inhibition zones compared to proximal hairs. Mousse had significant differences (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) between time points and locations for both the hair bundles and discs, while shampoo only had a significant difference (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) between time points for the hairs. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Mousse was effective, and shampoo was only minimally effective in inhibiting bacterial growth in vitro, with the greatest effect occurring at the two&#x2009;hours time point. The distal hair shafts had greater inhibition.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37749747/