PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Drivers of decision making in pain diagnosis and treatment: Findings from an ethnographic study of veterinary practice.

Journal:
Equine veterinary journal
Year:
2026
Authors:
Smith, Rebecca et al.
Affiliation:
Department of Equine Clinical Science · United Kingdom
Species:
horse

Plain-English summary

This study looked at how veterinarians and horse owners make decisions about managing pain in horses, which is important for the animals' well-being. Researchers observed consultations at four veterinary clinics in Great Britain and talked to veterinarians and horse owners to understand their interactions. They found that discussions about pain are influenced by many factors, including the relationships between the people involved and the horse's situation. Sometimes, other issues can distract from focusing on the horse's pain, making it harder to address. The study suggests that improving how pain is discussed and managed in veterinary practices could benefit horses.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor pain management in horses is a welfare concern. The 'diagnosis' of pain cannot be separated from the broader set of interactions through which it emerges. The interactions that take place during veterinary consultations shape the ways in which, or whether, pain management is discussed. OBJECTIVES: To understand owners' and veterinarians' decision making in relation to chronic pain and its management. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative ethnographic study. METHODS: Data were collected from four veterinary practices in Great Britain between May 2023 and April 2024. Around 200 h of ethnographic observation was undertaken, including the observation of 47 consultations. Additionally, semi-structured interviews with 18 veterinarians and 25 owners/carers were conducted. Principles of grounded theory were drawn upon throughout the collection and analysis of data. RESULTS: This study focusses on the veterinary consultation, discussing how the interplay of actors-both human and nonhuman-affected pain diagnosis and treatment decision making. There were four key processes that were common across the consultations observed: 'Establishing the presence of painful issues', 'Searching for the cause', 'The (de)escalation of issues of concern' and 'Targeting the source of pain'. In each consultation, dynamic multi-actor interactions coproduced matters of concern, and these were the 'things' to which peoples' perceptions of pain were related. Pain diagnosis was not a 'matter of fact', but emerged through relational practices. Consultations could move towards a focus on the horse's management, however, other matters of concern could obfuscate discussions about the subjective experience of the horse. MAIN LIMITATIONS: Focus on leisure horse population. CONCLUSIONS: Pain could become a matter of veterinary concern if it emerged through unique contexts and practices. The nature of presentation to the veterinarian as well as the (re)construction of issues affecting the horse through veterinary medical practices could create tensions for pain management. Opportunities to improve practice are highlighted.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40714975/