Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Diagnostic accuracy of the SNAP and Spec canine pancreatic lipase tests for pancreatitis in dogs presenting with clinical signs of acute abdominal disease
- Journal:
- Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
- Year:
- 2014
- Authors:
- Haworth, Mark D. et al.
- Affiliation:
- School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Murdoch University Perth Western Australia Australia · Australia
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
This study looked at two tests, SNAP canine pancreatic lipase (cPL) and Spec cPL, to see how well they diagnose pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas) in dogs showing signs of sudden abdominal problems. Researchers tested 38 dogs, some with pancreatitis and some without, and found that the SNAP test correctly identified pancreatitis in about 82% of cases, while the Spec test did so in about 70% of cases. However, both tests could give false positive results, meaning they might suggest pancreatitis when it isn't actually present, in up to 40% of dogs with acute abdominal issues. Overall, the two tests agreed fairly well, but there were some cases where one test was positive and the other was normal. In conclusion, while these tests can be helpful, they are not perfect and should be interpreted carefully by your veterinarian.
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo (i) assess the clinical diagnostic accuracy of SNAP canine pancreatic lipase (cPL) and specific canine pancreatic lipase (Spec cPL) and (ii) assess the agreement of an abnormal test result between SNAP cPL and Spec cPL in dogs presenting with acute abdominal disease.DesignProspective observational cohort study.SettingUniversity teaching hospital emergency center.AnimalsThirty‐eight client‐owned dogs that presented with acute abdominal disease, with a known final diagnosis between March 2009 and April 2010. Dogs were retrospectively assigned into 2 groups, dogs with acute pancreatitis (AP) (Group 1) and dogs without AP (Group 2).InterventionsPaired serum samples obtained within 24 hours of presentation were analyzed using the SNAP cPL test and Spec cPL assay.Measurements and ResultsSNAP cPL clinical sensitivity and specificity was 82% (9/11 dogs of group 1) and 59% (16/27 dogs of group 2), respectively. Spec cPL clinical sensitivity and specificity was 70% (7/10 dogs of group 1) and 77% (20/26 dogs of group 2), respectively. Accuracy of the SNAP and Spec cPL for a clinical diagnosis of pancreatitis was found to be 66% and 75%, respectively. Agreement between a positive SNAP (cPL ≥ 200 μg/L) and a clinical diagnosis pancreatitis resulted in κ = 0.33. Agreement between an increased Spec (cPL ≥ 400 μg/L) and a clinical diagnosis of pancreatitis resulted in a κ = 0.43. The agreement between SNAP and Spec cPL (cPL ≥ 200 μg/L) for the entire cohort resulted in κ = 0.78.ConclusionSNAP cPL and Spec cPL results may provide a "false positive" diagnosis of pancreatitis in up to 40% of dogs presenting with acute abdominal disease. There is good overall agreement between SNAP cPL and Spec cPL; however, there were 4/38 dogs with positive SNAP cPL and "normal" Spec cPL.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.12158