Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Development of a clinical prediction score for detection of suspected cases of equine grass sickness (dysautonomia) in France.
- Journal:
- Veterinary research communications
- Year:
- 2018
- Authors:
- Randleff-Rasmussen, P K et al.
- Affiliation:
- Equine Clinic · France
- Species:
- horse
Plain-English summary
Equine grass sickness (EGS), also known as equine dysautonomia, is a serious nerve condition that affects horses that graze. Diagnosing EGS before a horse passes away can be difficult because it usually requires taking tissue samples from the intestines. This study aimed to create a scoring system that veterinarians can use to better identify horses that might have EGS based on their symptoms and other information. The researchers found that a score of 8 was effective in identifying suspected cases, correctly classifying 77% of the horses in their study. This scoring system could help veterinarians decide which horses need further testing for EGS, and while it shows promise, more research is needed to improve its accuracy with larger groups of horses.
Abstract
Equine grass sickness (EGS) (equine dysautonomia) is a neurodegenerative condition of grazing equines. Pre-mortem diagnosis of EGS is a challenge for practitioners as definitive diagnosis requires ileal/myenteric lymph node biopsies. This study aimed to develop a clinical score that could be used by practitioners to improve the detection of acute or subacute EGS cases in the field. Suspected EGS cases were declared by veterinary practitioners. A case was classified as confirmed positive if ileal or rectal biopsy samples showed neuronal degeneration typical of EGS. A semi-quantitative scoring system, including epidemiological and clinical data, was created to attempt to classify suspected EGS horses into confirmed positive or negative cases. Each variable was weighted based on a boosted regression trees model, while taking into account its clinical relevance. Twenty-eight EGS cases were confirmed by biopsy during the entire study period. The best cut-off value for the score to have a high sensitivity while maximizing specificity was 8, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 53%. In our dataset, 77% of animals would be correctly classified with this cut-off value of 8. Highest sensitivity was chosen in order to detect the highest number of potential cases. Our score represents an inexpensive and useful tool to aid in the identification of suspected EGS cases in the field and selection for further diagnostics procedures to confirm or rule out the disease. Application of the score to larger populations of animals would be required to further adapt and refine the score.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29204821/