Continuous administration of low-dose GnRH in mares I. Control of persistent anovulation during the ovulatory season.

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted during the operational breeding season to confirm that continuous, subcutaneous infusion of low-dose GnRH would not disrupt established estrous cycles (Experiment 1), and test the hypotheses that a similar treatment would stimulate secretion of LH and induce development of ovulatory follicles in persistently anovulatory mares (Experiments 2 and 3). Treatment with GnRH (5 microg/h) increased (P<0.001) serum P4 during the luteal phase (7.7+/-0.5 versus 6.4+/-0.5 ng/mL), tended to increase serum LH (2.6+/-0.27 versus 1.9+/-0.25 ng/mL), and did not modify interovulatory intervals. In Experiment 2, GnRH treatment (2.5-5 microg/h) of persistently anovulatory mares increased (P<0.001) serum LH compared to controls (0.5+/-0.08 versus 0.1+/-0.03 ng/mL), with all GnRH-treated and no Control mares ovulating. Mares exhibiting Delayed Recrudescence (n=29) or Lactational Anovulation (n=18), were assigned randomly in Experiment 3 to receive either (1) GnRH/GnRH (n=23); 2.5 microg GnRH/h for 14 d (Period I) and 5 microg/h during the subsequent 28 d (Periods II and III); or (2) Control/GnRH (n=24); no treatment during Period I (control period) and GnRH treatments as in 1 during Periods II and III. Percentage of mares ovulating and pregnant during Period I was greater (P<0.05) for GnRH-treated than Control mares. Thereafter, cumulative ovulation frequency (85%), pregnancy (72%) and cycles/conception (1.3+/-0.2) were similar between groups; however, interval to conception was reduced (P<0.01) by 10.3 d in GnRH/GnRH compared to Control/GnRH.