Comparison of urinary cortisol, urinary cortisol-to-creatinine ratio, and basal serum cortisol as screening tests for hypoadrenocorticism in dogs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates whether urinary cortisol (UC) and UC-to-creatinine ratio (UCCR) perform better than basal serum cortisol (BSC) in identifying dogs with hypoadrenocorticism (HA). METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study with 120 client-owned dogs included: 20 with HA, 42 healthy, and 60 with diseases mimicking HA. The UC and UCCR were determined on urine samples using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. The diagnostic performance of the UC and UCCR were assessed based on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A cutoff value of UC < 2 &#xb5;g/dL revealed 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 83.2 to 100) and 90.0% specificity (95% CI, 79.5 to 96.2) in diagnosing HA. A cutoff value of UCCR < 8.5 X 10-6 revealed 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 83.1 to 100) and 71.7% specificity (95% CI, 58.6 to 82.6) in diagnosing HA. A cutoff value of BSC < 2 &#xb5;g/dL and < 1 &#xb5;g/dL revealed 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 83.2 to 100) and 51.7% specificity (95% CI, 38.5 to 64.8) and 100% sensitivity (95% CI, 83.9 to 100) and 90% specificity (95% CI, 79.8 to 95.3) in diagnosing HA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BSC < 1 &#xb5;g/dL showed the same sensitivity but higher specificity than BSC < 2 &#xb5;g/dL. The UC < 2 &#xb5;g/dL showed noninferior performance compared with the BSC < 1 &#xb5;g/dL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: UC should be considered a promising screening test for canine HA.