PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Classification of Veterinary Subjects in Medical Literature and Clinical Summaries.

Journal:
Studies in health technology and informatics
Year:
2024
Authors:
Hiltner, Marcel et al.
Affiliation:
Institute for Medical Informatics · Germany

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Human and veterinary medicine are practiced separately, but literature databases such as Pubmed include articles from both fields. This impedes supporting clinical decisions with automated information retrieval, because treatment considerations would not ignore the discipline of mixed sources. Here we investigate data-driven methods from computational linguistics for automatically distinguishing between human and veterinary medical texts. METHODS: For our experiments, we selected language models after a literature review of benchmark datasets and reported performances. We generated a dataset of around 48,000 samples for binary text classification, specifically designed to differentiate between human medical and veterinary subjects. Using this dataset, we trained and fine-tuned classifiers based on selected transformer-based models as well as support vector machines (SVM). RESULTS: All trained classifiers achieved more than 99% accuracy, even though the transformer-based classifiers moderately outperformed the SVM-based one. DISCUSSION: Such classifiers could be applicable in clinical decision support functions that build on automated information retrieval.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39234724/