Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Characterizing masticatory motion of dogs using optical and electromagnetic motion tracking.
- Journal:
- Frontiers in veterinary science
- Year:
- 2025
- Authors:
- Goldschmidt, Stephanie et al.
- Affiliation:
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences · United States
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how beagle dogs chew different types of food using special tracking technology. Researchers found that when beagles chew, their jaw mainly moves up and down without much side-to-side motion. The amount their mouths open while chewing didn't change much, regardless of whether the food was hard or soft, but they chewed kibble faster than other types of food. The study's findings can help improve the design of dog food to better protect their teeth and gums.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of masticatory motion across a variety of food materials is essential fortesting and simulation of the food-teeth interaction. Yet, the masticatory motion has never been fully characterized in the domestic dog (), limiting our ability formodelling. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize masticatory motion among a variety of different foods in beagle dogs using optical and electromagnetic motion tracking. RESULTS: We confirmed that the masticatory pattern in the beagle is a hinge motion with no clinically meaningful horizontal motion of the mandible. The mouth opening was not significantly difference among different food and treat types regardless of food stiffness and force to fracture of the food, with a mean and standard deviation of 2.51  ±  0.33 (range 1.93-2.95) cm between the canine teeth during chewing. Conversely, frequency of chewing was influenced by food type, with kibbles having a significantly higher peak mean chewing frequency (2.93 Hz) compared to other feeds. Frequency of chewing was linearly correlated to the force to fracture of the food material ( = 0.03, R = 0.56), while stiffness of food did not significantly affect peak chewing frequency. CONCLUSION: Data from this study can guide ex-vivo modelling of the feed-teeth interaction for product design and testing, especially those that focus on prevention of periodontal disease and dentoalveolar trauma.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40678494/