Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Cardiocirculatory changes in hemorrhagic shock induced in pigs submitted to three distinct therapeutic methods.
- Journal:
- Acta cirurgica brasileira
- Year:
- 2010
- Authors:
- Abreu, Gilberto Fernandes Silva de et al.
- Affiliation:
- Department of Surgery · Brazil
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the response of pigs submitted to hemorrhagic shock and treated using three different strategies. METHODS: Thirty-five Dalland pigs were divided into four groups: Control; Bleeding; Saline and Saline + Red Cell Concentrate. Parameters evaluated: heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and central vein pressure (CVP).Hemorrhagic shock was induced by removing (624.25 + or - 64.55), (619.30 + or - 44.94) and (664.23 + or - 39.96) ml of blood respectively, with the following treatment: Bleeding Group - zero volume replacement; Saline Group - replacement with 676 ml of 0.9% saline solution; Saline + Red Cell Concentrate Group - replacement with 440 ml of 0.9% saline solution + 291 ml of red cell concentrate. The treatment was evaluated after 10 (T3), 30 (T4), 45 (T5) and 60 (T6) minutes. RESULTS: HR: No statistically significant difference was found between the Bleeding and Saline [p=1.000], Bleeding and Saline + Red Cell Concentrate [p=1.000], and Saline and Saline + Red Cell Concentrate [p=0.721] groups. MAP; Significant differences were found between all the groups studied. CVP: No significant difference was found between the groups. CONCLUSION: Non-replacement and euvolemic resuscitation maintained a satisfactory hemodynamic pattern in controlled severe hemorrhagic shock in swine. The euvolemic replacement strategies exceeded the limit values of MAP for rebleeding.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20126901/