PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

A randomised, parallel-group clinical trial comparing bedinvetmab to meloxicam for the management of canine osteoarthritis.

Journal:
Frontiers in veterinary science
Year:
2025
Authors:
Innes, John F et al.
Affiliation:
Movement Referrals: Independent Veterinary Specialists · United Kingdom
Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

In a study comparing two treatments for pain from osteoarthritis in dogs, researchers looked at bedinvetmab (a new medication) and meloxicam (a common anti-inflammatory drug). They included 101 dogs with osteoarthritis and found that both treatments helped reduce pain, but bedinvetmab seemed to have a slightly better effect, although it wasn't statistically significant. The dogs receiving bedinvetmab had fewer side effects compared to those on meloxicam, especially gastrointestinal issues. Overall, both treatments were effective, and bedinvetmab appeared to be a safer option with fewer adverse effects. This information can help you and your veterinarian decide on the best pain relief for your dog with osteoarthritis.

Abstract

Bedinvetmab (Librela), a fully canine anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, was compared to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam in dogs for the management of osteoarthritis-related pain in a randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study. Subjects were recruited from general practices as client-owned dogs with appendicular osteoarthritis. Dogs were block randomised 1:1 to either daily oral meloxicam or bedinvetmab, administered subcutaneously once a month. The primary endpoint for efficacy was the change from baseline in the Canine Orthopaedic Index (COI) score. Linear mixed-effects models were used for statistical analysis conducted on a per-protocol and intent-to-treat basis. We hypothesised that bedinvetmab would demonstrate superior efficacy and safety compared to meloxicam; the number needed to harm (NNH) for meloxicam, relative to bedinvetmab, was calculated. Of the 190 screened dogs, 101 were randomised (bedinvetmab 52; meloxicam 49). Overall, both treatment groups showed a significant reduction in COI scores relative to baseline (&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). The bedinvetmab group experienced a larger mean reduction in COI scores, but this was not statistically significant. A significant effect of the visit was observed, with later visits showing a significantly greater reduction in COI compared to Visit 2 (&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). The bedinvetmab group reported four (AEs), whilst the meloxicam group reported 17, with nine of those being gastrointestinal system disorders. Additionally, more dogs in the bedinvetmab group completed the study (&#x202f;=&#x202f;44) compared to those in the meloxicam group (&#x202f;=&#x202f;33). This is the first study to compare bedinvetmab to an NSAID for the management of osteoarthritis-related pain in dogs. The results suggest that both products are equally effective in managing OA pain, with efficacy improving over time for both treatments. Bedinvetmab was associated with fewer AEs. These data will aid clinicians and pet owners in choosing analgesic options for dogs with osteoarthritis.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40196808/